International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut ero labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco.

GUIDE FOR AUTHORS SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT
Forthcoming
Original Research Article

Relative Pairwise Ranking: A normalization-free ordinal ranking approach for multi-criteria decision-making

Do Duc Trung
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3190-1026 (unauthenticated) Hanoi University of Industry, Tay Tuu, Hanoi, Vietnam
Branislav Dudic
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4647-6026 (unauthenticated) Comenius University Bratislava, Faculty of Management, Bratislava, Slovakia
Nazli Ersoy
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0011-2216 (unauthenticated) Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, 80000, Türkiye
Duong Van Duc
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3619-1078 (unauthenticated) Hanoi University of Industry, Tay Tuu, Hanoi, Vietnam
Mulla Veli Ablay
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4027-3949 (unauthenticated) Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, 80000, Türkiye
Aleksandar Ašonja
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6667-1024 (unauthenticated) University Business Academy, Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management, Novi Sad, Serbia

Published 2026-08-27

Keywords

  • Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM);,
  • relative rairwise ranking (RPR);,
  • decision making; pairwise comparison

Abstract

In Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods, selecting an appropriate data normalization technique is a complex process. An unsuitable normalization method may distort the intrinsic ranking of alternatives. To address this issue, this study proposes a normalization-free, ordinal pairwise ranking approach, referred to as Relative Pairwise Ranking (RPR). The method evaluates alternatives based on criterion-wise pairwise dominance and aggregates these outcomes using criterion weights, providing a scale-independent and interpretable ranking framework. The performance of the proposed approach is evaluated through illustrative examples and a real-world case study, supported by sensitivity and comparative analyses. The results indicate that RPR produces stable and consistent rankings across different weighting schemes and demonstrates robustness in the tested rank-reversal scenarios. These findings suggest that the proposed approach offers a practical alternative to normalization-based MCDM methods.

Article history: Received (March 14, 2025); Revised (May 14, 2026); Accepted (May 18, 2026); Published online (August 27, 2026)